tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-479165730362492593.post2503714668381406751..comments2024-03-27T10:16:07.154+01:00Comments on DeltaPatents EQE Paper C: EQE 2010 - First impressionsDeltaPatentshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07830354704918972593noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-479165730362492593.post-50886577944464476622010-04-08T14:37:58.704+02:002010-04-08T14:37:58.704+02:00Although I did a partial problem attack for claim ...Although I did a partial problem attack for claim 2 - i was a bit confused if this was correct - because the two features were linked (though had different effects)<br /><br />was a more general (i.e. not strict partial problem approach) approach required?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-479165730362492593.post-12385052381470501292010-04-01T16:48:34.834+02:002010-04-01T16:48:34.834+02:00Are the attacks of claims 2 and 3 both "parti...Are the attacks of claims 2 and 3 both "partial problem attacks"? Or are the effects non-synergistic in case of claim 2.<br /><br />I did a partial problem attack for claim 2 and 3.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-479165730362492593.post-4849478999414979552010-03-31T13:43:53.338+02:002010-03-31T13:43:53.338+02:00My next posting will certainly be about ranges. I ...My next posting will certainly be about ranges. I am planning to do that one next Tuesday.<br /><br />Hint: read GL C-IV 9.8 (ii)Joeri Beetzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12409253743595819144noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-479165730362492593.post-51682794010425608382010-03-31T13:07:57.595+02:002010-03-31T13:07:57.595+02:00Really interested in your take on claims 4 and 5
...Really interested in your take on claims 4 and 5 <br /><br />- a bit of debate on the EQE forum about whether to attack under NOV or I.S. due to differing takes on the selction criteria are fulfilled <br /><br />- especially whether the sub-range is 'purposive' or not.<br /><br />http://eqe-online.org/forum/showthread.php?t=7603Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com